Compare
TIO vs manual data entry
The status quo is a person re-typing every shipment email into the TMS. Here is how that compares to having the data assembled for review, dimension by dimension.
Book a Demo The short version
Manual data entry works. It also taxes every shipment with the better part of an hour of re-typing, and that tax grows in lockstep with your volume.
The alternative
Manual data entry
Re-typing every email into the TMS by hand
- 45 to 90 minutes per job moving data from email to the TMS
- Copy-paste mistakes compound across the job
- The record of what happened lives in scattered email threads
- Hours grow one-to-one with shipment volume
With TIO
TIO
The data assembled for you, your team reviews
- 8 to 12 minutes to review a pre-filled record and approve
- Confidence score per field; low-confidence fields flagged
- Immutable, exportable audit trail on every job
- Volume no longer means proportionally more typing
Side by side
Dimension
Manual data entry
TIO
Time per job (email to TMS)
45 to 90 minutes
8 to 12 minute review
Consistency
Varies by person and day
Same rules, every job
Accuracy
Errors compound silently
Flagged for review before approval
Audit trail
Buried in email
Immutable and exportable
How it scales
Linearly, the wrong way
Sub-linear
Who keeps the judgment
People, rushed
People, with time to think
The bottom line
TIO does not file or submit anything autonomously. Your team reviews and approves every record. The judgment stays with your people. The typing does not.
See it run a real shipment